Published: October 31, 2024

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is a puff peice to distract. Microsoft has made no effort to lessen their carbon footprint.

    • Syd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not supporting Microsoft, but didn’t they just lease out a nuclear power plant to reduce their carbon emissions?

      • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Three Mile Island, and they want to do it to power their AI development. Not move their current servers and infrastructure to the nuclear power grid.

        And the owner of Three Mile Island, who’s working with Microsoft, is trying to get the fed to give him the money needed to get the plant running again. Taxpayer money for Microsoft’s AI project that they’ll reap all the reward from.

    • SilverFlame@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I recently had a tour of the Redmond campus. They have multiple geothermal wells for power as well as an air conditioning system that uses almost no energy, it was pretty neat.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Too bad all that cool stuff is negligible compared to what actually makes a difference

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            56 minutes ago

            Like making a datacenter so hungry it needs an obsolete nuclear plant, yeah. They should be building new nuclear for existing datacenters.

        • bean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          With huge campuses some business have, I wouldn’t call it negligible. Unless you yourself are running a huge business campus and have some insight on how these noobs should be doing it. 😅

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Fire suppression systems, and fire prevention mechanisms, are no joke in a data center.

      Plenty of systems that displace oxygen in the room to prevent combustion.

      Many places won’t let you even bring combustable materials into the data center spaces. Receiving department unboxes and puts cardboard right into the baler. Wanna store stuff in your cage? Better be in a tote.

      Also, humidity is strictly controlled to prevent static buildup.

      The most likely place for a fire to break out in a data center would be from battery backup systems. But at the scale that most large facilities have, there is a dedicated battery room, or they use something else for instantaneous load transfer, like flywheels.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wood is a carbon sink.

        Growing trees and building things out of them is good. Trees are renewable.

        We ought not be cutting down forests for it BUT farmed wood is actually a good building material.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    What does a datacenter need a huge glass front for? Slashing carbon emissions? Yeah right.

    • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Clients looking to rent data center space still like to see pretty spaces in their giant concrete boxes. So on a campus there is usually one of the builds that has something prettier for the front admin section.

      But square footage is money, so it’s much smaller.

      They actually go for LEED certification for their spaces a lot of times. So they get an energy efficiency badge for a building that uses the total power of a ~3500 homes (in the builds I have seen) 24/7/365.

    • gsfraley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, that’s the mechanism by which carbon is removed. It goes into tree, tree dies or gets cut down taking all the solidified carbon with it, new tree gets planted in its place to repeat the cycle. In fact, the fastest way to scrub carbon with the practice is to farm trees, assuming you do it sustainably.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        You mean sequestered, not removed. It’s one fire away from being back in circulation.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        So the best thing you can do with a tree, is to cut it down and use it as materials, if we want to release as little CO2 as possible?

        And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

        • gsfraley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes. Growing a tree from sapling to a giant trunk removes significantly more carbon from the atmosphere than an existing trunk sitting there at mass, unable to store much more carbon.

          And yes, that’s why I clarified that new trees would need to be planted, right on the money.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

          Hence farming trees…

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trees are carbon neutral. They pull the carbon out and sequester it in themselves. When they rot or burn, the carbon is returned.

  • Cryan24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    So lots of heat plus combustible material… That sounds like a winning idea to me.

    • Blemgo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If memory serves right, one of Germany’s datacenters went up in flames a few years ago because they had wooden flooring and no adequate fire suppression systems.

      EDIT: it was in France, and Europe’s biggest datacenter.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve also put wood panels on my car to save the environment. It’s pretty useful.