silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 months agoWe Study Climate Change. We Can’t Explain What We’re Seeing.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down10
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkWe Study Climate Change. We Can’t Explain What We’re Seeing.www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoThey aren’t going to abolish NOAA. Just…cut out stuff that goes against what they want to hear. I guess it’s the same thing in the end.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoThey won’t need to abolish it. They plan to replace the 11,000 hired contractors with loyalists, just like every other agency.
They aren’t going to abolish NOAA. Just…cut out stuff that goes against what they want to hear. I guess it’s the same thing in the end.
They won’t need to abolish it. They plan to replace the 11,000 hired contractors with loyalists, just like every other agency.