• tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Instead of a red mirage, we got a blue stayathomeandnotvote. Harris got 10-13M votes less than Biden in 2020, and even Trump seems to be getting less votes than the last time (counting still ongoing). I was told there would be a record turnout in this election.

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I was I could blame the patriarchy but the numbers are consistent for dem votes going back to 2004. The extra people who voted in 2020 didn’t show up again.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Sure is!.. and deciding to change candidate without a democratic primary was part of finding that out.

          Gen-Z men also shifted towards Trump.

          So progress is unfortunately not linear, but can slip back to darker times. Which is not great.

          Edit: Also, though I think lots of Trump voters vote for him because he’s unusual. They see him as a vote against the usual. Against establishment candidates, and against the standard social-political contract. So establishment candidates being disconnected from what voters actually want is a big part of it.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No it’s not. Voter disenfranchisement is more advanced than it previously was, especially for minority voters, and it may not have been a real choice not to vote, but rather last moment voter roll purges, late absentee ballots, or simply not being able to make it through the line before closing time. Even if it was just a lack of motivation, inertia is not the same as accelerationism even though they have the same effect, and it’s reasonable to be curious about whether people stayed home or specifically voted for a person who’s been pretty heavily targeting them this campaign season.

              • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 hours ago

                According to all my convos dems weren’t progressive enough to let win. Sooo they let Trump win…

                  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    33 minutes ago

                    Well if the dems shatter it will guarantee GOP victory for years.

                    I wish they went with my plan and kept teaming up against the GOP for now and then turn on the dems once the nazis are out.

                    Though i get the feeling if everyone did, the dems would end being being just like the GOP once they see all the free votes sitting there.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No it’s not. People won’t participate in a system they feel only exists to harm them. If i am at a bar and one bartender says they are gonna kill me if i dont tip 50% and the other bar tender says that they’ll only rough me up a bit if i I don’t tip 30%, not getting a drink from either.

            People would rather not participate instead of legitimize a system that only does them harm.

            • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              OK but the first guy is still going to kill you

              I’m really hoping that this wasn’t the reasoning people had for throwing the planet under the bus

              • BakerBagel@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                People have been screaming at you for 8 years that “Not Trump” is not a viable election strategy. You need to offer an actual, concrete alternative. Until the Democrats start actually offer real alternatives, they will continue to be shocked these results.

                • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I don’t need to offer anything. I’m from a country with a parliament, ranked choice voting, proportional representation. But if you still don’t get that not Trump should absolutely be better than “whatever, I guess”, you deserve what’s coming.

      • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Yep. It’s truly been an election that’s not missing drama. Two assassination attempts, sitting president dropping out with 4 months left, open fascism, couch fucking, non-white female runner for the first time, all polls absolutely incorrect… Just to get an orange shit heap to fuck over Ukraine, Palestine and our climate. Could Igo back to the boring Obama years, please?

        • hobovision@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Again the polls seemed to be OK. I need to have the article ready with the headline “We are a normal polling error away from a landslide victory for either candidate”.