• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.

    What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You’re right about the regulation but I’m not so sure about the copyright exemptions. All in all, you’d think he’s more likely to side with property owners - especially the heirs of media empires - over progress.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “Allowing the rich and powerful to get around copyright is good, actually, because it means copyright MAY someday go away”

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.

        • hobovision@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Don’t forget the current supreme court motto though: “rules for thee but not for me”. Only massive and rich corporations will be allowed around copyright rules, but you and I and indie and open source will be held to the letter of the law.