Summary

Bernie Sanders criticizes the Democratic Party for neglecting the working class, leading to their recent election losses.

He highlights issues like economic inequality, job displacement, healthcare costs, and foreign policy as key concerns for the American people.

Sanders questions whether the Democratic leadership will address these issues or remain beholden to big money interests.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Working class people can also suck, tho. Remember all those stickers they put on the gas pumps blaming biden for the price of gas. Like, common you fucking fools, that’s ridiculous and you would never let your bitch boy trump take the credit for that.

  • Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hi. Working tradesman. I still voted blue even when the 4 years under trump were mostly better for me than under Biden. Of course most likely coasting off of Obama’s era. But I got no relief under Biden. I pay $20k a year for my Healthcare and still have to pay thousands a year out of pocket for visits. My family in Ukraine is still unsure what’s going to happen in the next year. Many of brothers in my local are unemployed now during the hardest time to pay to live. We hear the record profits the corporations made and swindled the working class dry so we can eat yet there has been no relief. How did making 6 figures for a family of 5 turn into almost living pay check to pay check.

    I’m ok with sacrifice if it means others get the help they need. But I don’t think anyone got the help they needed. We sacrificed for no benifit to anyone but the elite, and we are continuing to be ignored.

    This is what Sanders is talking about. And I’m afraid of what Trump is going to do for many Americans. For my Ukrainian family back home. For my neighbor who is Taiwanese. But recently I’m more worried to keep food on the table for my kids. I don’t even care who won anymore. I have election and political fatigue. I did what was asked. I keep doing what everyone thinks is right. But I’m burning out.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This comment spoke to me. I’m in the trades as well. I vote blue because, its further left than I can get from the red party.

      Best of luck. We will need it.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      You’re likely eligible for your states Medicare subsidies. Democrats fixed the family glitch in 2022, so you’ll likely save thousands switching off your employer plan, even if you’re making low six figures.

      Of course those subsidies expire in 2025, and there is a snowballs chance in hell of those getting renewed now.

      Democrats did a lot of things to improve the lives of working class, at least as much as they could get pass the Republican house.

      Their problem is messaging. They are terrible at communicating what they’re doing, and how it’s going to help. I mean part of that problem is the media (ie fox news) is allowed to lie and Dems try to tell the truth. The playing field is not really level.

      • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Another headache is that everything dems do is means tested, so you’ve got to jump through a bunch of hoops to figure out if you’re even eligible for any new program. Even if the programs do give relief to people, it’s much harder to message on a complicated program with layers of bureaucracy rather than “everyone gets 3k per child no matter what.”

        • Consumer2747@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          I’m in social work and this is huge. Trying to sign people up for these programs feels so invasive. I regularly apologize for the invasion of privacy and the implied judgement of these means-tested forms.

          This is the legacy of the Clintons and those that followed them giving credit to the idea that you have to prove you’re deserving. Not only do means-tested programs have a negative psychological impact, they’re stupidly inefficient. They require lots of outside labor to make them even marginally effective.

          The people who need them often barely have time/energy to take care of themselves, so you end up needing this whole extra layer of professionals to help them through the barrier. They all need grant it state funding of their own. All that money could be more efficiently distributed if the gates were gone, or even designed to be useable by the people who need them, in the circumstances they’re in.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The DNC needs to allow voters to elect who they actually want during the primary. We were force fed Hillary because the DNC didn’t want Bernie. We didn’t even have a primary because we were force fed Biden, then given Harris because Biden was so unelectable. The DNC must allow democratic process to take place so that voters elect the presidential candidate that they want.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Democratic party aside, Bernie couldn’t get the votes. I actually think the news media has been a much much bigger problem with someone like Bernie getting power. They always try to paint someone like him as being radical, when anywhere else in the world he would be a normal person on the left.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The issue with Bernie is that everyone knows he’s a socialist. If there was someone else who presented the same ideas Bernie has while also saying “I’m totally not like Bernie” people would actually vote for that candidate. Most Americans are closeted socialists, they’ll in favor of socialist policies as long as you don’t call it socialism.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        they’re too busy sanewashing totally normal ideas like seperating children from parents, tariffs on every import, and mass deportation. Totally rational positions squarely in the overton window.

        What will they say about the concentration camps those immigrants are rounded up into? What will they say about the military being deployed to round up residents? I guess we’ll find out.

        Taxing billionaires though, how radical

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      we don’t do that anymore, having “democratic” in party name is enough. be prepared to have liz cheney as nominee with ben shapiro as her running mate in 2028.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The DNC is too old and too set in its ways. They’re like a bad police force- unreformable.

      The only way forward for the DNC is to visibly jettison their old guard and hope enough voters give them another shot- which is also a maybe at best. Losers lose.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I hate to defend a major party, but it does feel like people expect Democrats to fix all the nation’s problems when they have utterly no power to do so.

    The reality is most Americans are not with Bernie on the things he’s talking about. The average American has been heavily propagandized by the corporate media (not just news media, all of it) to love corporate stuff. Capitalism good, socialism bad, cheap gas good, electric stoves bad. Go to most Americans in the rust belt, that’s how they think.

    If Democrats are supposed to skip to the part where they implement policies that no one currently supports outside of liberal intellectual circles with all the power they supposedly have, that’s skipping to the end. What’s Bernie’s solution for getting people outside of Vermont on his side to begin with?

    • splonglo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yougov US: Support for universal health care - 55.9 % vs 24.4% oppose

      Can’t find much data on the corporatism stuff, but don’t think that’s true either

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    He’s partially right.

    Unfortunately, I think the bigger issue is that a majority of Americans are fascists or indifferent to fascism.

    “But are there not many fascists in your country?"

    "There are many who do not know they are fascists but will find it out when the times comes.”

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      majority of Americans are fascists or indifferent to fascism.

      I’m not convinced of that at all. Here’s what I see:

      A large portion of ignorant uneducated and easily manipulatable people who don’t even know what fascism is.

      • Large groups of religious people who focus on voting red because Christianity, their churches, pastors, and religious groups, and the abortion issue.

      • Actual bigots. There’s a lot of them and they like the racism, anti gay, nationalism, deportation stuff. Want women subjugated.

      • Bullies, tough guys, “alpha male”, and the “get money” crowd. There’s a lot here too, and many in poor young black and Hispanic groups in addition to a lot of white males. Not necessarily bigots, but generally want women subjugated whether they know it or not (sex objects).

      • The large group of just vote red without thinking because it’s what family and friend circles do and always have.

      The above I think don’t understand fascism at all. Not educated or informed enough.

      Edit: I would say to be “indifferent to fascism” you have to actually understand what it is, and I don’t think much of the maga crowd does. My opinion/speculation.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah I also don’t agree. You honestly have to discard a lot of public information to force yourself into this level of ignorance. For nine years he’s told us he’s a proud piece of shit. If they didn’t listen for that long that’s on them.

        • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Is it really so hard to believe that’s exactly how millions upon millions of people go about living their lives?

          Yes, that does seem completely insane to people like you and me who don’t tolerate that level of willful ignorance in ourselves, but to someone else that’s all just noise that they tune out.

          Ever heard the phrase, “Hell is other people“? I’m slowly starting to believe this existence is a punishment.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I didn’t say it’s hard to believe. It’s hard to stomach it, is my point. Yeah hell really is other people. After this, I now fully believe that most Americans wouldn’t piss on me to put out a fire.

            We will always be known as a shameful group of probable idiots as a country, and we also will be known as happily setting the first huge fascist domino up then slapping it down carelessly. Autocrats around the world just got a blueprint that will work if they take advantage of idiots properly. We fucked the world, not just ourselves.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Existence is a blessing, and the lessons are hard, we just can’t cheat our way to the next level or graduation. We have fallen for the drive through mentality and that’s false hope and not laying change.

            • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Your existence might be a blessing, but I live in constant pain with genetic diseases that I couldn’t prevent and can do very little about. The cost of healthcare has nearly bankrupted me multiple times, and Trump being elected again is most definitely not going to improve any of this for me.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 minute ago

                My dear friend, I also have physical, genetic and financial challenges. The Democratic party did zero to alleviate any of them. I could, and in the past did, wallow in self-pity and I sometimes catch myself headed there again. Everyone has their own challenges, affording is opportunities to grow, stretch and develop. The election is a new challenge, an opportunity to free ourselves from “the devil we know.” We can seek new solutions, or go back to old ones forgotten by history. We can organize and demand again affordable living, job safety, living-wage, 40 hour a week jobs, equitability. People fought and died to give us these things and we pissed them away by being complacent, voting blue “one more election.” Roosevelt didn’t embrace the New Deal because it was the right thing to do, he did because it was politically expedient, and may have feared literally heads rolling. While I, we all prefer comfort and stability, peace and tranquility, domestically if not abroad, we’ve grown complacent and cowed. This is our “dangerous opportunity” to get back what was lost, and perhaps more. If we fail to do that, we will face more consequences of our actions and our instrument inaction.

                Fwiw, I’m supposed to be on about 20 meds, several considered absolutely necessary. I’m on none, largely due to financial constraints. I’ve found alternatives for Manny, the rest turned out to be oversell. Diet and exercise can heal a lot. Herbs can heal more, but do proper research and mind contraindicate. Perhaps exercise isn’t doable for you. Seek alternatives and please join me in working for change.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Did you completely miss this:

        "There are many who do not know they are fascists but will find it out when the times comes.”

      • minnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Completely disagree, a person doesn’t have to understand what fascism is to be a fascist or indifferent to fascism, any more than they need to be an expert on dogs to not kick or oppose kicking one.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Actually I changed my mind and disagree with my other comment LOL.

          I still find it hard to call an extremely ignorant uneducated person a fascist, who is being manipulated by an actual fascist leader. They’re just potentially being manipulated. The dumber they are, the easier to manipulate.

          Some or even many of these people conceivably would change their stances and choices if provided with lots of education. Some.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            A mage once said that in mistaking poison for wine, the mistake doesn’t forgive and save your life. Bad paraphrase.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Ignorance ultimately doesn’t excuse or justify their actions. Your beliefs aren’t as important as your actions. Not to say that they should be dragged behind the shed and shot, but that actions have consequences and they need to be held accountable for theirs. If somebody votes for a fascist leader and supports a fascist political party, they’re at least collaborators in fascism.

            You have to treat these people like they’re in a cult, because that’s what’s happening here. Trump’s rhetoric this past year has been eerily similar to Jim Jones near the time that they all drank the Flavor-Aid (almost identical, even). And when dealing with cultists, it’s important to remember that not all of them can be saved. After a certain point, even if they recognize that they’re in the wrong, most cultists will double down rather than admit that they were wrong - because they’re in too deep and to admit that they were fooled would be to admit that their entire life has been wrong and that what they did wasn’t justified.

            Hope that you can make them realize why they’re in the wrong, but be prepared to grab the knife that they might pull on you. Because that’s probably the more likely scenario.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Kindly, I disagree again lol.

          Indifferent:

          Having no particular interest or concern; apathetic

          I still argue you need to understand it to be indifferent about it specifically. However, I do believe these people are indifferent to having a desire to learn what fascism actually is and actual historical contexts.

          But we can agree to disagree 😀

          Edit: oops “to be a fascist” yes I’ll agree with you on that one sorry. They can be fascists without actually knowing that they are and how to define it.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The abortion issue is part of fascism. It creates a lower unequal class out of women.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’d say most of the maga base don’t know this though. Complete ignorance. Just “libs kill babies” is their thought process.

          I have a hard time thinking that someone who is dumb and manipulatable by a fascist, is actually a fascist themselves. They’re just dumb and easy to manipulate.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I like your spirit but the Democratic brand and party are entirely dead. Someone will have to start a new progressive party (which will be coopted by capitalism as soon as it shows promise)

      • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Establishing a new political party is often a challenging and resource-intensive endeavor that may struggle to gain traction. Instead, a more effective approach may be to launch a political movement, advocacy organization, or even form a caucus within an existing major party, such as the Democratic Party.

        Drawing from my experience as a former chair holder for the Ohio Green Party, I saw firsthand how difficult it is for smaller parties to sustain momentum and influence. The Green Party was consistently unorganized and unstable, making it challenging to build long-term support or advance impactful policy agendas. Many of these organizational challenges are common across emerging parties, which often lack the resources and structure to compete effectively in a two-party system.

        In contrast, launching a movement or organization allows for focused advocacy, mobilization, and influence on public opinion or legislation without the structural and financial constraints of a party. Additionally, establishing a caucus within an established party, like the Democratic Party, enables you to align with its broader base while still advocating for distinct goals and principles, potentially gaining a platform and influence within the party’s framework.

        These approaches often provide a clearer path to impact than attempting to overcome the structural obstacles of party formation, allowing for dedicated action and coalition-building within a stable framework, especially in the electoral college system. We have to be realistic here.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Hell, it worked for the American Assholes caucus or whatever the House MAGAs are calling themselves.

  • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Man, if he’d form a populist left party and stop caucusing with the Dems, he might get a lot of enthusiastic support and candidates running locally soon

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A third party, eh? Nah, he needs to take over the Democratic Party once and for all.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          No there needs to be a place for “moderates” and embarrassed former-republicans to gather. The actual left can mobilize around Sanders and the current Republican party can die.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        He had momentum, the DNC, also run by our oligarchs denied him of the opportunity.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Not for long

          Bernie kicks ass like a kung fu fighter

          Dems lost this election Bernie is still kicking and just won his seat back easy peasy

          Dude is an old motherfucker but kind of in the same way Samuel L Jackson is a bad motherfucker

      • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        We could also do this ourselves, if we could find a way to organize it.

        I’m sure with enough attention he’d acknowledge, and maybe support it.

        It may sound silly but what’s the alternative?

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I really think ranked choice voting is the answer here. It will open up the opportunity for third parties to actually gain traction.

          • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Me too but how are we going to get that changed before the next election?

            Before ranked choice voting we need at least one party to rally around with a candidate that focuses on popular issues. Once we have someone in office that will commit to those issues we can then talk about these kinds of changes.

            A good place to start would be at the state level since states run their own elections. For that all I can suggest is to get more actively involved in local politics than you ever have before.

            Of course, that’s assuming we have another election.

            • seaQueue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Never underestimate the obstruction from establishment Democrats at every level of government. We passed a bill authorizing statewide use of ranked preference voting in CA and our neoliberal democrat governor Gavin Newsom vetoed it. I generally support his policies but this one was a flat out “fuck you” to everyone alienated by the neoliberal business as usual party that runs our state.

              • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                18 hours ago

                The answer to obstruction at every level of government is to push back at every level of government then.

                That means getting involved in local government. You. Me. Us. All of us. Starting now.

            • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              19 hours ago

              That’s a good question. I think we need a massive push towards it, from our local officials all the way to the top. Bernie may get onboard.

              • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                18 hours ago

                True but nothings going to happen until we both demand it and actually do something about it.

                The time to be hopeful that one of the major parties has an awakening is over.

                • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Absolutely. I think that the best path of action is to let our local politicians know clearly that this is the desire of their constituents, and push hard to vote in candidates that support this. All of these politicians started somewhere, so the best hope for change starts locally and grows from there as word gets out.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You are confusing every day no political or financial power democrats with the democrats leadership… Democratic leadership gave up on their base 80 years ago. Can you name one major accomplishment the democrats have done at the federal level? The ACA? Maybe? But that was just a bandaid on a bullet wound.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        ACA wasn’t even a bandaid. It only helped the middle class by reducing and capping costs and removing preexisting condition clauses. The poors still couldn’t afford it, and were punished for that either by having to pay for the still expensive insurance or being fined at tax time. It’s not an insignificant reason we got trump in the first place.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Lol you’ve drank too much of the coolaid. The ACA was better than what we had before but still not even close to fixing our disastrous Healthcare System. Middle class people still can’t afford preventive care and the line between the poors and the middle class just gets smaller every day with the shrinking of the middle class. There is no marginal growth/change when we know the answer to this problem. Anything short of universal health care coverage cost none wealthy people their lives.

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Im mainly angry at ACA for the exact reasons you present here. Many benefited from it but the people i spent the most time around people who still couldn’t access care. Healthcare must be universally free to be meaningful.

            That said it did benefit people. Just not what it needed to be.

            • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              May point is arguing from the already compromised position didn’t bring about enough change.

              I am not Naive to, the realities of this world.

              I am not Naive to, the past pains and harms done to others that brought us to the current state of the world.

              I am not Naive to, the fact that change happens slowly and rearly without violence.

              I am not Naive to, the fact that I will not get everything I want financially, politically, or socially.

              I am not Naive to the fact that those that oppose my beliefs and values may come to do harm to me and those like me.

              I am not Naive.

              But I do know what’s Naive.

              It is Naive, to argue from an already compromised position.

              It is Naive, to not take on other struggles as your own because those that wish to do harm are on your side.

              It is Naive to, forget the lessons from the past.

              It is Naive to, think those worse off don’t hold limitless potential.

              It is Naive to, not argue for the most kind and empathetic position as possible.

              Because the compromise will be less kind and empathetic than the compromises that came before.

              We are not Naive.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Nah i dont think yall are willing to do it. 2028 you’ll be holding your nose again voting for an out of touch moderate to oppose trumps third term instead of giving a progressive you completely agree with any kind of chance.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Theres no primaries anymore. The wealthy party leaders decide the nominees.

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You dont think Obama in 2008 was a real primary? His campaign fought hard for that nomination, it definitely wasn’t handed to them.

            • Heir_Of_Isildur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Yep, that was the last real one. Since then the establishment didn’t want to lose control of the process, so they setup the primaries.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Oh, haha-ah, you sweet summer child. Sure you will, after all but two candidates drop out of the race and give their hard-won delegates to the conservative candidate in exchange for cabinet positions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

        –I kid, with the condescension, because this is what happened before many of us got a chance to vote in the primaries in 2020 -A primary that Kamala Harris dropped out of because she was deeply unpopular.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hrc was deeply unpopular. Biden was. Obama ran on personality and empty promises. He showed her was all too willing to sell himself when he first distanced himself from Rev. Weight, then moved his church membership. Phyrric victory, for him and everyone else.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s all too much. The Democratic party wants to be a big tent party, the party of all. That’s just not possible. Every group wants the party to prioritize their issues. Blacks and whites, straight people and gay people, men and women, young and old, religious people and atheists, owners and workers, cops and criminals, leftists, moderates, and conservatives, etc, etc, etc. We can’t give everyone what they want.

    I’m sorry, I really am, but we can’t make everyone happy. Especially since a lot of these groups do not like each other. Look, it would be great if all these different groups could come together in one big rainbow coalition of peace, join hands and sing Kumbaya but it ain’t gonna fucking happen. Stop trying to please and appease all these people and instead try to materially improve the lives of as many people as possible.

    Stop trying to achieve perfect justice for every identity group and just focus on making housing more fucking affordable for as many people as possible, and healthcare, and a decent education, and so forth.

    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Theres very little truth to this. Like most people that have broken the law arent identifying as criminals. Theyre not lobbying for more crime. Atheists arent trying to ban religion, etc. There are a lot of things that are just universally beneficial, like healthcare, environment, education. Its not a matter of opposing groups, its one group that wants to hurt people.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        There are a lot of things that are just universally beneficial, like healthcare, environment, education.

        Ok, so let’s focus on that stuff, then. My point is, maybe we can’t achieve perfect justice and fairness for everyone, so let’s just try to like make rent more affordable and make it so people don’t have to stress as much about paying their bills and maintaining a decent standard of living.

        • blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Oh that was up for vote, everyone here voted against it because it cant win.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If truck rich people and corporations had more regulation and taxes and we stopped blowing up people, having all our fingers and toes in everyone else’s pies, we could do that.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      focus on making housing more fucking affordable for as many people as possible, and healthcare, and a decent education, and so forth.

      Didn’t Biden work on these issues, successfully or unsuccessfully, in the last 4 years?

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    God fucking dammit he should have been the fucking president in 2016. Fuck this timeline.

  • argarath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I wonder why Bernie and other progressives don’t band together and announce their own party. With enough big names (especially Bernie) they could gather enough attention to be a viable third party that actually represents progressive and more left leaning ideas than the democrats. They have two years until the next local elections to get their foot on the race, I think they could get done traction if they actually go for that

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We already lost. The time is now to work on something new. Tuesday and the 60 days before it were shut up and vote. Today and the next 3.5 years are shout and organize.

    • chaonaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There is a lot of “invisible” work that party orgs do. If you want to see why big names and attention alone don’t work, look at the Green Party. They have name recognition, ballot access and even get a bit of the vote each presidential election. What they’re missing is the “ground game” that gives the presence in nearly every race in every precinct, and the local engagement to actually win an appreciable chunk of elections every year (not just the presidential years).

    • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bernie purposefully did not do that because he did not want to be seen as another Ralph Nader. He believed working inside the system would do more good than doing a dirty break. I also wish he went in the direction of a break from the democratic party, but that’s just not who he is.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sigh I was the same way but now I see that people just won’t get out out to keep evil men at bay. I had hoped we can stick with the dems until the GOP is not a threat and then make our break.

        If we made a progressive party now I wonder how many dire hard dems will join?

        • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Unfortunately I would think very few would care. For example, the Green party is very progressive, and comes with a TON of advantages electorally. They’re on the ballot in almost every state, run in local and national elections, and have a system all set up for nominating people, etc. When you look at the Green party’s platform, it’s very close to what the progressives claim to actually want. Yet most democrats just shit on them at every opportunity instead of voting for the platform they ostensibly believe in.

          • Kvoth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            To be fair, most people only know Jill Stein. And a suspected Russian agent who thinks Wi-Fi causes cancer is not the best foot to put forward

    • UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Bernie is not nearly as popular as most on the internet echo chambers would have you believe.

      The fact is this is now a money game. Grass roots campaings and parties are more disadvantaged than ever at being able to get their voice out to people, especially ones that arent perptually over connected to the internet and forums.

    • brian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      there is the democratic socialists of america that have a handful of elected officials, oddly not including bernie. it seems like they’re more of a sub party or organization within the dems though, not their own party

  • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yesterday and today feel like I’m reliving my mom’s election loss back in 2016. I was too young then to understand the weight behind what was going on at the time, although I did at least understand why Trump seemed like a dumb candidate. Anyways, I distinctly remember how when it was obvious that Hillary lost, even though she won the popular vote, that something wasn’t right. My mom was sobbing while looking for places to move into, since we were moving out anyways. Now, 8 years later, I’m having those exact same feelings as she did except with my boyfriend on my side, knowing very well that come January that if nothing happens, we could very well be one of his first targeted groups. I fucking hate this timeline, man.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I was in college and living with a bisexual Saudi friend at the time. I’m a straight white man, so I wasn’t a target, but he absolutely was. I sat with him in the kitchen while we got drunk and he cried.

      The good news is he made it through fine and I think is doing well today still in the US. It’s going to suck, but most of us are probably going to survive this. Don’t give up all hope. Build your community, organize, join mutual aid groups, and build what we need to take back power in the future.

      They’re going to try to take us backward, but make them take us kicking and screaming. Don’t give up and let them have it for free.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Bernie is correct for the 100th time. But is little too late now. Unless Dems are serious about tackling working class issues. I don’t see anything changing. Many people view the Dem party not for the average person anymore.

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Do people mean anything other than commodity and gas prices when they say “working class issues?” I feel like abortion, healthcare, education, and student loans are also working class issues, but I take it that’s not what people mean.