• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    No.

    They just copied redit. That included some bad decisions. Even when redit would do it better in the future, it still does not help lemmings.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The Fediverse is only gonna get better. The other ones will all come and go.

    In some number of years after another social media debacle or two, once the Fediverse has had some time to ditch its FOSS clunkiness, it’ll be game over for anything else.

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I don’t care, I just want a nice place to wander, nothing is forever, but the longer, the better, regardless of popularity

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      One difference though is social media. Reddit was able to gestate and grow without that massive clusterfuck sucking up all the internet’s oxygen. Nowadays with all the social media sites proper plus Facebook groups AND let’s not forget Reddit itself, there’s just massively more competition for attention online. The old 1.0 web forums are still around, many of them, but they’re small and relatively static. That could also be Lemmy’s fate.

    • jonathan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think people don’t realise how old Reddit is, it was smaller than Lemmy is now when I first started using it.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        and no subreddits! i was there too! it really started gaining traction and losing technical users when the ‘image macros’ started… memes took over

          • lordnikon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I was there too i was one of the ones that jumped over. I know its a big internet so maybe we both had different experiences. So maybe you are right and the timing was just a correlation and not causation.

            • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              reddit used to release page-views and maybe user info (i forget) annually.

              there was a bunch of users that jumped over to digg, but they continued to also use reddit. when digg died there was a small bump of digg users, but i dont recall anything noticable in the big subs

              • scarabic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Digg had a large viewer base and there was a lot of skullduggery going on amongst people who figured out how to game its algorithm, get on the front page, and direct traffic to some URL. But without actual data I would venture to guess that Digg and Reddit had roughly equivalent bases of actually genuinely active community posters and commenters and a lot of people were on both. Once Digg got taken over by the spam posters, it died off and Reddit remained. Reddit definitely inherited its mantle and probably many community members, but not the massive viewer audience.

              • lordnikon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Ah I only used Digg and never heard of reddit till Digg died and never joined most of the big subs. But also reddit was so small back then a small bump is a good kick start. Google trends data correlates with what I saw Digg was more search for in 2008 then by 2011 Digg was dead after the 4.0 debacle in 2010 and reddit took off in 2011.

      • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        it was smaller than Lemmy is now when I first started using it.

        so now we know whom to blame for its enshittification

      • Social media in general was also a lot smaller back then too.

        Until the iPhone got popular you had to use a computer to access it. And back then we didn’t really trust sleep mode very much so you had to wait 2 minutes for windows to boot when you wanted to go on the net. VS right now I’m standing in from of my clothes not getting ready for work for 45 seconds.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Wait to boot? Back then I had a dozen machines all running 24/7 lol. But I guess the average user on the consumer side yeah.

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m gonna say yes, for the exercise.

    Four assumptions:

    1. Reddit will keep getting worse, due to the nature of enshittification and venture capital. Eventually enshittification reaches a breaking point where people leave or stop arriving.
    2. Lemmy (in a broad sense - et al!) will keep getting better, due to.the nature of open source software.
    3. Non-free alternatives to Reddit will eventually enshittify, law of enshittification.
    4. Free alternatives will use ActivityPub for the obvious advantages.

    If these assumptions are met, given infinite rounds of enshittification and unhappy users, eventually a federated and free alternative will be the most lucrative option for the majority of users. Eventually Reddit will Digg itself a hole. Maybe Lemmy won’t take over then, but it’ll stick around.

    The most unrealistic assumption is of course that the federated solutions will keep getting better indefinitely. Maybe they won’t. But as long as people keep developing and contributing to the Fediverse, it’s alive and improving in a way commercial alternatives cannot in the long run compete with.

    • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If the API fiasco hasn’t really deterred enough Reddit users to convert, then almost nothing will. Except maybe when Spez gets around to monetizing NSFW subreddits and subreddits in general that are very large. But even then, I still say it won’t be a giant deal. They’ll come here but they’ll want the Fediverse to strongly appeal to NSFW content and really the Fediverse is fine without it poisoning itself with that filth.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Does it currently make a profit? If not they will find ways to make it worse. And even if they do make a profit chances are they’ll want to increase their margins.

        Maybe stuff like the Google deal could keep money pouring in while keeping usability at a respectable level though.

      • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can’t say I agree with NSFW content being “filth”, but I would agree that generally it’s harder for NSFW content to find a home over here due to the increased moderation costs it brings.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I also would not think of it as filth, but I also love its absence in Lemmy. Because that stuff acts like an STD and spreads and grows, and I’d rather just leave it out.