• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The OP was about the current conflict, which is a result of Zionism.

    I know about Herzl and mistyped. I can admit to an error. Can you be less smug?

    • Darukhnarn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You have to explain to me how you took Zionism from the meme. From what I can gather it’s about the general conflict in the holy land.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The current conflict is based on Zionism. Claiming that this conflict is a conyinuation of “1000 years” is Zionist propaganda.

        • Darukhnarn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The current conflict isn’t based in Zionism. It’s a convenient tool, sure but it’s not the root. The crusades also weren’t based in Christian fundamentalism.

          Religion is a tool to oppress and manipulate masses, but it’s not the driving factor in political rational. Just look at evangelical megachirch preachers in the U.S., religion is just a tool to them to gain more wealth.

          The underlying issue is a struggle for power and control over a regions geostrategical resources. Has always been and will always be.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            What do you think Zionism is if not the appropriation of Judaism (a religion) in order to settler-colonize the middle east?

            • Darukhnarn@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              Deutsch
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              So you agree with me? Unchanging underlying issues and the usage of varying ideological tools, Zionism as it was coined in the 19th century being the newest form, constitute the core of the Middle-East conflict and have so for millennia?

                • Darukhnarn@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Deutsch
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Oh please, the Middle East is the cradle of civilisation and settlements of the land of other tribes, nations, whatever you call it, have always been with us.Just because Europeans first had the tools to do it en Masse doesn’t mean it’s new or a European idea. Just look at China in Tibet, Arab in Egypt, Turks in Byzantine and so on.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Sigh this conversation bores me (the “cradle of civilization” bullshit did it for me).

                    If you can’t see the direct connection from european proto-capitalism resulting into colonialism which inspired the Zionists, then go on and believe in mytholocical notions of “5000 year old conflicts”.

                    BTW: “Cradle of civilization” and then acknowledging that China existed? Come on! 🙄