• taladar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know technically there are a few little islands on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean that you could count as European but I am assuming the main focus of European flights would be flights within Europe.

    • ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Right, forgot that Iceland, Greenland, and Faroe Islands are technically not part of Europe.

      Edit: yes, I know that the Faroes are not on the other side of the Atlant, but they are far enough away to be annoying to build tracks to.

      • tal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iceland and the Faroe Islands are normally grouped with Europe, and Greenland with North America.

        • ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly! While Greenland and Iceland are geographically considered American (or half Amarican, half European for Iceland) , they are geopolitically considered European countries.

          This means that a European rail, connecting all European countries, would need a rail to Greenland, which is on the other side of the Atlant.

          Now, I’m not arguing against trains, they are a useful tool for the right job, but planes fill a different role (small load but high speed transport to hard-to-reach locations) that trains cannot fulfill in the same capacity. So instead of abolishing planes, we should try to force them to be more environmentally viable.

          Thank you.