• 7heo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is actually the reason. Because there is no such thing as “natural intelligence”. Not more than there is “natural strength”. There are natural predispositions, yes, but what you get is function of what training effort you put in. Whether you realise, and/or like, putting effort into training your intelligence, is is another thing. So people who are “above average” were in a favorable environment that fostered their development without it feeling forced, or unnatural. And then, when the environment was replaced by the school’s, it sadly didn’t foster personal development anymore. I would argue we would need to redesign education, now that we have internet. We don’t have to design courses around physical limits.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there is no such thing as “natural intelligence”.

      Weell, some children have it easier to comprehend stuff on the logical/abstract level than others. Which feeds their curiousity. Which trains their intelligence…

    • Nowyn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is also not always about our intelligence but our skill set. I rarely have hard time learning when I want, but issue in my case has been in addition to probable ADHD and mental health issues that the system wasn’t designed to teach me studying.

      • 7heo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. You set limits. I understand your confusion if all you know is authoritarianism, but “setting limits” is actually diametrically opposed to “forcing”. Setting limits is literally how any fair society functions, literally how to educate, etc. Also, punctuation exists.