• higgs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There will always be loopholes. The nice thing with AI is that it’s constantly learning and adapt to new situations very fast.

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So that’s not inherently true. AI (at least in this sense of it actually being Machine Learning) does not learn on the fly. It learns off base data and applies those findings until it’s retrained again.

      • higgs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re correct and that’s way more efficient than teaching dozens of people what do ban. People make mistakes, Tech doesn’t (as long as it’s coded correctly)

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I reject that pretty majorly. Tech makes mistakes at a much higher rate than humans, even when built correctly. Tech just makes consistent mistakes instead.

          I don’t trust AI moderation of anything.

          • higgs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you have an example for a correctly built tech stuff which makes constant mistakes?

            • BURN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Pretty much any AI system.

              Photo AI still have issues determining between dogs and cats. Cancer detection AIs were analyzing x-rays and basing decisions off the doctor who signed them.

              The Boeing 737 MAX built a properly working Autopilot system, but didn’t train pilots correctly, causing pilots to expect functionality similar to older versions and causing plane crashes. The software was 100% right, but it made mistakes because the human input was different than expected.