I am not allowed to credit the site that has this disaster. Its owner said “Nobody should see that”

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    1·
    2 months ago

    Huh, neat. The last time I looked, chrome was also plagued by this. Might actually re-start some projects I had, but it sucks to have to use chrome.

    inline-flex is indeed necessary since we’re growing left to right and flex would take the entire/fixed width, unless it’s also inside a flexbox.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      it sucks to have to use chrome

      I also hate to admit it, but Chrome currently is the superior browser.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        1·
        2 months ago

        EDIT: Alright, this is a terrible case because the parent element has flex and therefore no inline-flex is necessary there, but I’d argue it’s the parent element being flex that is redundant, rather than child element being inline.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          1·
          2 months ago

          Inline means that your element should be treated like text. Your element is NOT text. Thus you shouldn’t use inline.