• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    US supreme court

    “Supreme Court”, Guardian. It’s a proper noun. We don’t call your stuff the “UK house of commons”, and that isn’t a difference between British English and American English.

    And it’s not a typo, because you consistently did it through the whole article.

    justice department

    “Justice Department”. Well, really, “Department of Justice”, but whatever, people use that informally.

    sixth US circuit court of appeals

    “Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals”.

    How is it that you stripped caps off of every proper noun referring to a government institution in the entire article, but still managed to capitalize “Starbucks” and “Workers United”?

    EDIT: And they do it in another article too:

    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/apr/24/us-supreme-court-abortion-rights-emtala

    For the second time in a month, the US supreme court on Wednesday heard arguments in a major abortion-rights case, the second to reach the justices since they overturned Roe v Wade two years ago.

    But there they do capitalize the FDA in that article:

    Food and Drug Administration

    EDIT2: And they did capitalize the NLRB in the first article, so not every government institution:

    the US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)

    EDIT3: And their counterparts at The Telegraph and the BBC are capitalizing the proper nouns for the same institutions:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33103973

    Who are the justices on the US Supreme Court?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2024/04/22/supreme-court-homeless-fine-grants-pass-oregon-park-tents/

    The US Supreme Court will rule on Monday on whether cities can fine people who set up homeless camps in public spaces.

    • twistypencil@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      I’ll bet you ten internet points that the guardian doesn’t read this. Yes I failed to caps that just for fun

    • MrNesser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      It’s the guardian do you really expect them to grammar check their articles?

    • Pooptimist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      23 days ago

      Who gives a shit? Do you have any idea how often I read German words written by English speakers which are fucked up beyond belief? But I acknowledge that the world doesn’t revolve around my country or my language

    • Phuntis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      23 days ago

      waaaahhhh why won’t the rest of the world pretend we’re the only ones that matter we’re important and special and the default that should always be assumed how dare you go against that waaahhh

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        That’s not at all what they said.

        But good effort trying to act like a child, I guess.

        • Phuntis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          22 days ago

          they complained that a british newspaper called the US supreme court exactly that instead of The Supreme Court even though we have our own supreme court and so do many other countries and so it’s worth clarifying it’s just a typical yank throwing a hissy fit when everyone doesn’t pretend the world revolves around them