A search for Threads content on Twitter currently brings up zero results, despite plenty of links to Meta’s microblogging rival being posted on the platform.

  • Anomander@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And no one is surprised.

    Elon made it clear shortly after taking over that “free speech” was speech he happened to agree with, and he had no intentions of ethical consistency on ‘free speech’ when it came to speech that was critical of him or his platform. Twitter already went nuclear on links to Mastadon and similar alternative platforms earlier this year while their dumpster fire was raging.

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I think what he said was that anything allowed by law would be permitted, whatever that means. But then when they started impeding links to mastodon he was like “we don’t have to let you advertise our competition >>>:(.” Elon/Twitter has gotten so tedious to hear about.

      • Anomander@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing there is that like … it’s not about consistency or values. The fact that he lied is meaningless to him, throwing it in his face is wasted effort. Communication is a tool to get what he wants, not a goal unto itself.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t like when people use their boosted presence to say that minorities are a threat and ought to be exterminated, yeah.

          What’s with people pretending we are talking about pineapple on pizza whenever hate speech is mentioned?

          • ram@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s with people pretending we are talking about pineapple on pizza whenever hate speech is mentioned?

            Because some people (and reddit users in particular) use the strategy of putting everything in the same bag to silence dissent. All it takes is the majority calling ‘pineapple on pizza’ hate speech and now nobody can talk about it in fear of being called a hater.

              • ram@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you have a single example to back this up or are you ready to admit you’re just talking out of your ass?

                I do. Discussing whether trans women should be allowed to compete in women sports will get you branded as a transphobic right wing nazi in 99% of Reddit’s subs, and probably banned too. Once you are labeled your arguments are moot, because you are a hater.

                • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’ll find no lack of people with very good arguments about this matter, as well as many who are tired to rehash it over and over again when it has become very clear that many are not satisfied simply with setting rules for women’s sports. There are people being radicalized through a minor issue into generalized hate. For an example, what is happening in US Florida is not about women’s sports.

                  But I wasn’t even talking about women’s sports, I was referring to how there are people literally referring to minorities as subhuman and calling for them to be wiped out. Is that not hate enough for you?

                  For someone so concerned that your arguments might be mischaracterized, you sure are quick to make sweeping assumptions about people you don’t know.