A new artificial intelligence tool accurately predicts certain forms of cancer at least three years prior to a diagnosis::undefined

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think he means algorithms. And since up to a couple years ago, before AI became the new tech buzzword

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They use machine learning, which is a subset of artificial intelligence. It’s not just a buzzword here.

      • matthewmercury@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Admittedly I’m an amateur, but I consider “automation” to encompass algorithms, heuristics, cron jobs, shell scripts, lambdas, basically anything created to do some steps that we’ve already figured out. As I understand it, machine learning uses statistical algorithms. The article makes the process sound like heuristics, though:

        “K-ECAN uses basic information already readily available in the EHR, like patient demographics, weight, previous diagnoses and routine laboratory results, to determine an individual’s risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma,” said Rubenstein.

        I wouldn’t consider any of that kind of automation to be “intelligence.” Most of the stuff we currently call “AI” is the best form of automation that we can create right now, but it’s still not AGI.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with you that machine learning does qualify as AI, and that it applies here. That wasn’t the original discussion, though. I was just saying that algorithms did not traditionally qualify as AI, up until the recent trend of calling EVERYTHING AI.