Damn, this is a sad day for the homelab.

The article says Intel is working with partners to “continue NUC innovation and growth”, so we will see what that manifests as.

  • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus Christ. Why does it feel like tech industry is just getting shittier and more expensive, while all the cool consumer options are being axed. Intel Nucs were a relatively cheap way to get a cute little desktop machine or a home server. I am sad that they’re going away. I guess there’s always Minisforum, but still…

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah this part bothers me. To these companies a solid profit stream is not viable. It has to be iPhone level growth year after year or they think it’s failing and axe it. It’s quite annoying. Eventually you will hit a plateau. That just means it’s a mature market, not failing. Grrrr…

        • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You see the same shit on streaming services. “Oh this show has been out for two days and hasn’t reached Game of Thrones level of popularity already? Let’s remove it from existence forever.”

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is unsustainable. We’re seeing what happens in late capitalism. The belts tighten, the workers get left in the dust, the products consumers actually want get the axe.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We don’t even have capitalism yet, what late stage are you talking about?

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can read about capitalism in Wikipedia.

              Most countries today move towards economical fascism, where governments exercise control over private property but do not nationalize it. Lobbying, donor interest protection, cronyism, rise of oligarchy - you can see it in many countries. And then inevitable radicalisation of the public and scapegoating everything else as the core issue. Capitalism, migrants, ecology - everything is a problem but the government.

              • shortgiraffe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Contemporary capitalist societies developed in the West from 1950 to the present and this type of system continues to expand throughout different regions of the world—relevant examples started in the United States after the 1950s

                This Wikipedia article says that the US is a capitalist system.

                Lobbying, donor interest protection, cronyism, rise of oligarchy

                Where are these things listed in the article as being incompatible with capitalism, and their presence meaning it’s some other system?

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where do you have capitalism in US? US is probably one of the most anti capitalist countries in the world right now.

              • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s not really true though and it’s anecdotal. The anti-capitalist mindset might be growing due to awareness and people suffering at the hands of capitalism (continued layoffs, increased cost of groceries and rent, union busting, worker exploitation), but that’s because of the ever-tightening squeeze of late capitalism. When you have a structure that requires infinite growth to exist, in a world with finite resources, you end up with the current state of the US.

                I think it would be more accurate to say that the anti-capitalist mindset among the working class has definitely grown in the US, but at its core, the US is pro-capitalist.

                • Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Where’s US pro capitalist? It’s one of a few countries with legal corruption called lobbying, which helps big corps to shield themselves from competition. US today has a plethora of laws and regulations which create and sustain monopolies. US has whole industries created by lawmakers and completely stonewalled from anyone entering them. Capitalism my ass…

                  Also capitalism doesn’t require infinite growth. I don’t know where you people are getting that lunacy from.

                  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Laws and regulations that allow capitalists to continue their pursuit of infinite growth. One of the definitions of capitalism is simply:

                    The concentration or massing of capital in the hands of a few

                    This is like a 1:1 definition of what we have in the US today, and our government enables, protects, and benefits from it. It’s “late” capitalism because it’s grown into a completely unsustainable system.

                    Late capitalism is the acceleration of growth and concentration of wealth in the hands of a few, with various crises being the result (layoffs, inflated prices, union busting, cuts in safety—e.g train derailments, etc).

        • key@lemmy.keychat.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That article is utterly unconvincing. It just handwaves the finite nature of our material reality with a very weak appeal to “infinite” human creativity. And then the conclusion is that infinite growth is necessary because there’s no way to change the status quo of wealth hoarding. It’s just apologism for the very worst aspects of capitalism without a single iota of serious thought.

          • snarf@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think there is any hand waving. Consuming a resource is not the only factor that goes into economic growth. Can you address that point specifically?

            • key@lemmy.keychat.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I won’t because it’s irrelevant if it is the only factor or not. It’s the limiting factor. Please don’t engage in red herrings.

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You won’t because you don’t understand what you’re talking about.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chip shortage. Since COVID, chip companies have been having a really hard time getting properly restocked. This impacts all electronics industries. Cars, computers, even Apple had to redesign some of their products to accommodate the shortages, so has many other companies big and small. The Raspberry Pi prices have soared. So products that take a chip away from a more mainstream or lucrative market are being axed.

    • EDRBd97kWbT2KzK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Intel NUCs were very good machines but honestly they were completely overpriced compared to Chuwi/Minisforum/etc.

      My guess is they were just not enough sales, that’s all.