• Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    And how is the problem solved currently in your mind?

    The difference between what we have today and what we want to see isn’t some magical world where things work perfectly, it’s one where people can make the changes directly without a ruling class deciding for us.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I try to think of systems that are stable and can scale up to cover everyone (this is also a pipe dream, since people aren’t purely rational). The idea of no one in charge, and the community deciding and enforcing everything can work up to a small town level, but a national or global level, it falls apart.

      Some things, like major infrastructure for example, are necessary to have, but impossible to fund through voluntary means. No individual or small community has the money to build it on their own, and getting everyone to agree on what exactly should be done for any given project is damn near impossible. There needs to be a central planning authority of some sort, and they need to have the funding to execute these types of projects. Now what scale and format that planning authority has is the heart of every debate on which political system is best.

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The community is in charge. It’s democracy without a class of rulers. Its people working together because it brings them mutual benefit instead of a system built on exploiting others for personal gain.

        You can have a “central planning authority”, it would just be voluntarily made up of those small town level groups.

        • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can have a “central planning authority”, it would just be voluntarily made up of those small town level groups.

          Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but you could have central planning, but they wouldn’t have any authority…

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      As long as the apps at the top of the app stores and songs on the top of the charts are the ones that corporations most advertised, and as long as people will listen to conspiracy theories from Q Anon and demand freedom of speech from Twitter, I genuinely do not trust people to have direct access to decision making. Ask middle class Americans think the biggest political issue right now is the tik tok ban

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        So instead you prefer the decision making to be in the hands of a small group of people all paid for and owned by the corporations, and who pander to the conspiracy nuts?