• Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is how not to use Arch… Update at least once a month, or if not maybe at least twice a month. If you can’t handle the updates on Arch then consider switching to something like Debian…

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Guys, Arch isn’t unstable, you just can’t handle Arch if you don’t treat it a specific way”

      • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        All Linux distros are kinda the same really.

        • Use them incorrectly & they’ll break…
        • Use them correctly & they’ll just work…
        • Kayn@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          By that logic, is not updating for several months incorrect behaviour?

          If so, that would be quite problematic, since even other rolling distros like Tumbleweed don’t have this problem.

    • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not like I cannot handle the updates. I really love arch for its flexibility, and with that come bleeding edge updates. Fedora is the next best thing but I’m definitely not as experienced there and it’s quite often lacking packages that arch does provide, either via its mirrors or the AUR