• RiQuY@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Now I need to consider Gitea and Codeberg. Thanks for the reminder GitLab.

    • rho50@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t use Gitea, use Forgejo - it’s a hard fork of Gitea after Gitea became a for-profit venture (and started gating their features behind a paywall).

      Codeberg has switched to Forgejo as well.

      Also, there’s some promising progress being made towards ActivityPub federation in Forgejo! Imagine a world where you can comment on issues and send/receive pull requests on other people’s projects, all from the comfort of a small homeserver.

      • RiQuY@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        ActivityPub integration on git remote repos sounds very interesting. Thanks for sharing that, I’ll definetely take a look at Codeberg/Forgejo.

      • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Can’t wait for forge federation, it’s super annoying that I need an account for each individual instance just to report a bug

        • rho50@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          From here:

          • SAML
          • Branch protection for organizations
          • Dependency scanning (yes, there are other tools for this, but it’s still a feature the open source version doesn’t get).
          • Additional security controls for users (IP allowlisting, mandatory MFA)
          • Audit logging
      • zgasma@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        radicle.xyz checks those boxes, but it’s gossip protocol, not activitypub.

        Still cool, though.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They’re required to take down content following a DMCA takedown request. It’s up to the uploader to counterclaim if they’re so inclined, at which point they’re able to put it back up.