• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    I read a pretty brutal analysis by a financial expert on some business magazine site. My biggest takeaways were:

    • new shares get 1 vote per share, existing shareholders 10 per share
    • under the rules they are doing the ipo they can skip providing solid numbers for the last years, and are unbound by board opinion on how much money can go into executive compensation and golden parachute packages.

    Now I’m not an investor at all but this rings so many grift alarm bells I don’t understand why anyone would buy that shit. Seems like a completely dubious investment set up to pay out spez and then collapse.

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Seems like a completely dubious investment set up to pay out spez and then collapse.

      Are they trying to hide this intention?