0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoYeah yeah, we know you're speciallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down130
arrow-up1990arrow-down1imageYeah yeah, we know you're speciallemmy.dbzer0.com0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square136fedilink
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up15·8 months agoI thought they standardized on sd* even for IDE drive a few years back…
minus-square0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-28 months agoYeah, that’s what I think as well… Got a few old rigs with IDE drives in them running Void x86, the drives in /dev are named sdx.
minus-squareDumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoI didn’t know that. Maybe nvme hasn’t been added to the standard yet then.
minus-squarejj4211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·8 months agoNo, they decided that nvme were too fancy to be modeled by mundane ‘sdxn’ scheme. They hypothetically have ‘namespaces’ and ‘controller paths’ and they wanted to have the naming scheme model that fully.
I thought they standardized on sd* even for IDE drive a few years back…
Yeah, that’s what I think as well…
Got a few old rigs with IDE drives in them running Void x86, the drives in
/devare namedsdx.I didn’t know that. Maybe nvme hasn’t been added to the standard yet then.
No, they decided that nvme were too fancy to be modeled by mundane ‘sdxn’ scheme. They hypothetically have ‘namespaces’ and ‘controller paths’ and they wanted to have the naming scheme model that fully.