The most famous forms of Holocaust denial and revisionism tend to focus on Jews, casting doubt, for example, on how many were exterminated in the camps. But denying the impact the Nazis had on the other groups they targeted, including queer and trans people, disabled people and Romani people, is still Holocaust denial. Maybe someone should tell J.K. Rowling.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Once I found out that Harry Potter glorified the British class system by having it take place at an elite private school where people less privileged than them are looked down upon and even called names I was already turned off… but once I got to the obviously antisemitic goblins, I was done.

    I wish it wasn’t so damn popular.

    Edit: I realize this article isn’t about antisemitism. This is just another example of Rowling’s bigotry.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t care about HP, but it’s just a standard fairy tale. I read the books to my kids. Stories about knights, kings, princesses, super heroes…pretty much any story in which a normal person can fantasize about being someone who has much more power than they do, have been the stock-in-trade for story-tellers forever. Harry Potter lives a terrible life with his abusive relatives until he gets whisked off to a fancy private school where, it turns out, he is pretty special. Does it glorify the British class system? Sure, in some ways. But, it also undermines it insofar as Harry’s friends are mostly from the lower classes, and the villains are mostly “old money” and those who are obsessed with genetic purity. Also, the entrenched authorities like the Ministry of Magic are shown in a rather poor light, with their dementors, cruel bureaucrats, and insanity-inducing prisons. Hermione is meant to symbolize someone who got to Hogwart’s based on ability, not birth or connections. So, the story is at least partially about the transformation of the old structures of power from being based on money and birth to being based on ability. It shows British power structures in transition, I would say. What do you think?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That may very well be so. I did not get that impression from the first book, but, as I said, it was the only book I read and maybe it was clarified in the sequels.

        By the way, my father was a similarly privileged to go to a prestigious British school on scholarship despite coming from a poor background and had nothing but bad things to say about it, so that does color my judgment a little.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          That explains it. Each book gets progressively darker. The first book was written for 11 year olds, if I recall correctly. It doesn’t really get into politics. The subsequent books expose the corruption of the class system and the horrifying complicity of the bureaucracy.

    • mellowheat@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Once I found out that Harry Potter glorified the British class system by having it take place at an elite private school where people less privileged than them are looked down upon and even called names I was already turned off

      Do the books glorify that, though? I seem to remember that only the blatantly evil characters thought like that.

      Granted, the last 3 Harry Potter books I read were all Methods of Rationality, so perhaps my understanding of canon is too good.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I admit it’s been a long time and I only read the first book, but I seem to remember everyone used the term “muggles.”

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Like @mellowwheat said, the main character is a “half-blood” and the chosen one; one of the friends is “muggle-born” yet one of the most powerful magic users in recent memory; and the other friend is a “full blood” wizard who still kinda sucks.

          Even the core three characters are supposed to be allegorical for “racism doesn’t mean shit.” I honestly don’t know how JK went from writing fiction that could be interpreted as pro-trans (at least from the standpoint of the movies), into doubling down on bigotry. I guess it was Twitter after all.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I guess, but the impression I got from the book I read was that those terms weren’t considered offensive enough for even the good characters to stop using them. Maybe I’m misremembering or maybe that gets addressed in a future book?

            • Zahille7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Tbh I’ve only watched the movies so I can’t say for the books, but the movies definitely gave me that vibe. Well, any of them after the first one. And from what I remember, the main “good guys” only use the “no-no human words” a few times at the beginning of the series, whereas they’re mostly used by the bad guys throughout the whole thing.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                In that case, it’s hard to know whether that is Rowling and I have a poor memory about this or that the movie’s screenwriter made revisions on that front. I think either is a possibility at this point. I’d love someone else to chime in who is more familiar with the books.

                • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I think thats the script writers, if memory serves right muggle is pretty inoffensive in the books partly cause the bad guys have their own term “mud blood” for those who are born to non magical parents. Honestly I think at worst its comparable to how people said “negro” in a non racist way back during and before the civil rights era here in the US. But I legit dont know if Rowling meant for those undertones, im not familiar enough with British civil rights history.

                  Also Rowling may have been aluding to that for all I know cause the wizarding world is pretty explicitly backwards, serisouly they cut themselves off from the rest of the world sometime in the 1800. One of the secondary protagonists dad is a magical ATF agent who tracks down enchanted mundane artifacts that re-enter the non magical world.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Muggle isn’t considered offensive within the world, it’s just the British term for a non-magical person. Wizard/witch for those with magic, muggle for those without (in America we call them No-Maj, which is fucking awful)

              Some of the bad characters will say it in a sneering or mean-spirited way, but they often don’t use it at all and go instead for subtler terms like “those lesser than us” or “the filth” and similar

              The only term in the series that’s considered “offensive” is mudblood, which is basically a mixed race slur (it’s a wizard/witch born to one or both muggle parents), and it’s very much addressed as not OK to be said and why it shouldn’t be said and how much it can hurt people (from Rowlings fave character, no less!)

              It’s insane to me that the person who wrote that into book 2 went on to be a fucking TERF

        • mellowheat@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The main character is “half-blood” and his main sidekick is “muggle” herself, so I’d wager not so glorified. Of course, there’s an undercurrent of racism there, because the bloodlines really really matter. But this is fantasy fiction so I don’t how much of a sin it is. Bloodlines mattered in Tolkien too.

          I’m not sure if that last sentence is against or for my argument.

    • noseatbelt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hogwarts is not elite. Anyone can enrol if they have magical ability. It’s addressed in a later book that attendance is not mandatory but nearly every witch and wizard in Britain is educated there. It’s just a school that doesn’t even have an admittance exam.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        if they have magical ability

        That’s exactly what makes it elite. There’s automatically a class system.

        • noseatbelt@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m sorry I don’t understand what you mean, do you want non magical people to attend a magical school?

          • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The fact that magic is only for some, that’s the elitist part. There are some people that are inherently better than others

          • Fungah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            They could just fail every class for 8 years and be passed to the next anyway.

            No different then public school system st the end of the day.

        • noseatbelt@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m sorry I don’t understand what you mean, do you want non magical people to attend a magical school?

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s the thing that makes everyone defending this shit so sus. Harry Potter has so. many. layers. of terrible shit in it. Maybe people didn’t realize it when they were reading the books as a child because they were young and naive, but as an adult you should be able to recognize shit like the only Asian character being named “Cho Chang” and realize you’re reading an awful book written by an awful person. The fact that people know about Rowlings bigotry and still read HP to their kids blows my mind. If we all just agreed she was a shitty person and stopped passing her garbage writing along, she’d be forgotten in a generation.