Move follows Alabama’s recent killing of death row inmate Kenneth Smith using previously untested method

Three of the largest manufacturers of medical-grade nitrogen gas in the US have barred their products from being used in executions, following Alabama’s recent killing of the death row inmate Kenneth Smith using a previously untested method known as nitrogen hypoxia.

The three companies have confirmed to the Guardian that they have put in place mechanisms that will prevent their nitrogen cylinders falling into the hands of departments of correction in death penalty states. The move by the trio marks the first signs of corporate action to stop medical nitrogen, which is designed to preserve life, being used for the exact opposite – killing people.

The green shoots of a corporate blockade for nitrogen echoes the almost total boycott that is now in place for medical drugs used in lethal injections. That boycott has made it so difficult for death penalty states to procure drugs such as pentobarbital and midazolam that a growing number are turning to nitrogen as an alternative killing technique.

Now, nitrogen producers are engaging in their own efforts to prevent the abuse of their products. The march has been led by Airgas, which is owned by the French multinational Air Liquide.

  • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is it their say though? It’s not a lease, once someone else owns it they can do what they want with it.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      For a fun example to talk about look at Deadmau5’s Purrari.

      The Nyan cat wrapped Ferrari.

      Legally Ferrari had little they could do. There was some things to do with putting a modified badge they could stop. While on finance they could recall the loan due to the modifications affecting the equity in the car.

      But any seller of any product has the backstop that they can ban further purchases and refuse future services. Or even potentially be required to buy their home nation.

      Why would Nitrogen gas suppliers not want this?

      As a global company, do you want to risk losing a major market by supplying a product for executions.

      If you sell your product for executions you are officially selling a poison.

      Do you want the regulation involved to have to background check every customer to ensure they are not using it for lethal purposes?

      Do you want the additional import and export controls on your product?

      Are you held liable in any way if someone deliberately uses your product for euthanasia or suicide? Potentially. That’s why several countries have limits on the volume of paracetamol an individual can purchase.

      The Terms of Service is a sticking plaster, probably not even enforceable, but the bare minimum to avoid further regulations on the industry. But it’s certainly worth nitrogen gas suppliers trying to avoid themselves being dragged into a hornets nest of politics, morality, and costly regulation.

      Banning a small customer, in prisons, from buying your product could save you a lot of money in the long run.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Only for direct sales. Prisons could still just go buy through an intermediary, unless the first party sale contract also forbids that. Even then, it’s questionably not enforceable. It’d be like me selling my car, but doing so with a contract stipulating that the buyer can’t re-sell the car to someone that may use it for a particular (and legal) purpose.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        What will happen if these states violate these contracts? The companies will sue them in the very same courts that ruled the death penalties?