• Sparkega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            62
            ·
            6 months ago

            Eliminates a malicious threat vector. Gives you piece of mind to charge your devices without worry that what you connect to is going to interact with your device.

          • eyeon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            6 months ago

            it’s also safer when wanting to charge from untrusted chargers, though you can still get an adapter to block the data pins or just bring your own wall charger/battery when traveling

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think power only cables should exist because they are significantly cheaper, but they should have some kind of marking to differentiate them enforced by the standard

      • Zamundaaa@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        They are afaik not allowed to exist with USB C. And except for some very few very sketchy manufacturers, it’s also luckily not a thing in practice.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not the cables that are the issue, it’s the manufacturer that don’t design their products to USB C specification so they don’t charge via C to C cable like it should.

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I just buy Anker for everything and as a result most of my cables do what I expect them to.

    • the_weez@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      It does look kinda sketchy for a full 3.0+ data cable. Could be one of those stupid charging only cables.

  • Zink@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Either it’s usb to wall or usbc to usbc with all the features. I don’t own anything else out of pure fear.

    • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Do you throw away all your cables when new features are added?

      Only when you start to own a device that uses one of those new features?

      • randombullet@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The latter.

        I have 2 types of cables. USB 2.0 100w PD capable cables and USB 4 cables.

        The USB 4 cables are too heavy to travel with so I have many more USB 2.0 PD cables.

        I also have a sprinkling of USB 3.0 compliant A to C cables.

        I throw away all the included USB 2.0 A to B to avoid mixups.

      • Zink@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The latter. New features don’t matter till I get a new device with them

  • vsis@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m too lazy to label them. So, I usually keep the PDs connected to the charger and that’s it.

    But if it becomes a problem I’ll probably use a wire labeler.

    It would be nice if they came labeled from factory, though.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Coloured electrical tape, way cheaper than wire labels if you only have a few to mark.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I honestly have never had this issue with USB-C. A and Micro, absolutely. Mini, every day from like 2004-2007. But never C.

    Have I just been buying all the right cables without knowing it?

    • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is absolutely not a “US under regulation thing”, that makes no sense. What “regulation” would dictate what a connector carries over its cable? That would be compliance with the spec, and the spec is a connector.

      USB-C can carry USB 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 4.0, PD, DisplayPort, wattages from 5w to 100w & Thunderbolt 4. No one cable would be required to carry all those or all cables would be $50/ft.

      Just because you’ve never encountered a USB-C power only cable doesn’t mean they don’t exist in your country. They’re made by the bucketload in China, and you’ll encounter one soon enough.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      How long can that last? Only a matter Of time before the Gideons start leaving them in hotel rooms and then before you know usb power cables are out and about like an invasive species.

      • PassingThrough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Actually, that leads me to another point:

        One upon a time, the concept behind a universal USB-C connector was so we could do exactly that.

        Laptop? Phone? Camera? America? Germany? Japan? Power? Connect the to TV? Internet?

        Wouldn’t matter anymore. USB-C to cover it all. Voltage high for the laptop, low for the camera, all available just the same in every country, universal. So yes, fill the airports and hotels with them. Use them for power and to play videos on the TV. Because we weren’t supposed to have to question the voltage or abilities of the ports and cables in use.

        Did/will that future materialize?

        • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          It will never happen.

          No one’s gonna buy a $30 cable rated for 100w and 120fps video to charge their phone. They’re gonna buy the $5 one at the gas station that’s only rated for low power charging.

          No manufacturer is gonna put the hardware to safely deliver 100w in their phone charger. They’re gonna do the cheaper lower power option, and people already say the ones that do include this functionality are greedy price gougers for charging more than the $5 low power charger at the gas station.

          How soon before manufacturers start stripping those high power delivering ports out of laptops because they raise the risk of permanent damage under a failure too high for the market/brand to bear?

          It’s no fun to be laughing at the people who all wanted a usbc-only world and are now having to live in it but here we are.