smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1847arrow-down110
arrow-up1837arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square150fedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up125arrow-down1·10 months agoWe cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up129arrow-down3·edit-210 months agoThere are now three competing standards. https://xkcd.com/927/
minus-squarebaropithecus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down2·10 months agoI know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
minus-squareThunderbird4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-210 months agoI’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
minus-squarepewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·10 months ago#switchtodisplayport
minus-squareTattorack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·10 months agoYes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
There are now three competing standards.
https://xkcd.com/927/
I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
Oh? Let me CEC on that…
I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
#switchtodisplayport
Yes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!