“The literature identified indicates that uniforms have no direct impact on academic performance, yet directly impact physical and psychological health.”
“The literature identified indicates that uniforms have no direct impact on academic performance, yet directly impact physical and psychological health.”
Wrong in this case where the statement was “it’s proven” the disprove of the statement is that its not proven or disproven because of mixed data. Learn to read. Or stop arguing a lost point…
Are you mentally challenged? Your own source says that there is no scientific evidence that what you say is true.
You can’t just claim something, provide a source that says there is no credible data and think someone is wrong because you have a source that speaks against your claim “its scientific consens”
You won’t read it, but here you go anyway
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8386814/
Doesn’t sound like concrete evidence to me
If someone changed their mind after reading a single study, you could get them to believe anything.
And yet most people on Lemmy base their beliefs on a single online article
That’s because you’re cherry picking.
“The literature identified indicates that uniforms have no direct impact on academic performance, yet directly impact physical and psychological health.”
That’s because you’re cherry picking.
“The literature identified indicates that uniforms have no direct impact on academic performance, yet directly impact physical and psychological health.”
The study literally disproves the guy lol…
Mixed data isn’t disproof.
Wrong in this case where the statement was “it’s proven” the disprove of the statement is that its not proven or disproven because of mixed data. Learn to read. Or stop arguing a lost point…
Your feelings don’t qualify as disproof, chum.
Look up the evidence yourself. No need to show the world how bitter you are that a teacher once gave you a detention for being insufferable.
What’s your point? Cant win logically so we go adhominem… wow.
You’ve presented nothing that disproves my point, and no evidence to prove yours.
So yeah, you can either do so or get ad hominems at this point.
Are you mentally challenged? Your own source says that there is no scientific evidence that what you say is true.
You can’t just claim something, provide a source that says there is no credible data and think someone is wrong because you have a source that speaks against your claim “its scientific consens”