GitHub - PySimpleGUI/PySimpleGUI: Python GUIs for Humans! PySimpleGUI is the top-rated Python application development environment. Launched in 2018 and actively developed, maintained, and supported in 2024. Transforms tkinter, Qt, WxPython, and Remi into a simple, intuitive, and fun experience for both hobbyists and expert users.
github.com
Python GUIs for Humans! PySimpleGUI is the top-rated Python application development environment. Launched in 2018 and actively developed, maintained, and supported in 2024. Transforms tkinter, Qt, ...

Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

  • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
    931·
    9 months ago

    If this project has other contributors, imagine how betrayed they must be.

    Opening the project as FOSS until it becomes popular and then closing it to make money is such a scummy tactic

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      40·
      9 months ago

      Fork the last commit with a LGPL commit?

      GPL mentions explicitly that it is irrevocable, where as LGPL doesn’t mention anything about it. IANAL, but it looks like there is a case for irrevocable without violation of clauses by default https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/4012/are-licenses-irrevocable-by-default#4013

      For people considering contributing to FOSS in the future, maybe check for irrevocable clauses? I wish licenses selectors https://choosealicense.com highlighted this part more clearly.

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        9 months ago

        Also depends on the contributions terms.

        If they were a traditional FOSS, they can’t change the terms without all contributors agreeing or removing/modifying the contributed code so that they no longer have ownership of their authored sections.

        Either way, it’s a dick move.

        • mborus@mastodon.social
          5·
          9 months ago

          @fidodo @SkyNTP Sure, but unless that someone keeps it updated that fork will be useless soon. And that looks like a lot of (unpaid) work.

          I like the project (was surprised to even see my user name in the contributor list) but stopped using it because I couldn’t get accessibility working (mainly no full keyboard shortcuts).

          For me, buying a yearly developer license to have a few GUI pop-ups at work is something I’ll only consider if I run out of options.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        7·
        9 months ago

        I’ve had to sign specific paperwork regarding copyright for just big projects, many smaller ones take contributions without paperwork, which would leave the rights with each contributor. They be better dot their i’s and cross their t’s, it just the legal fees could isnk them before making any money from the commercial license.

        IANAL, just in case.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      5·
      9 months ago

      If any contributors haven’t signed a contract letting them close the source, this opens them up to lawsuits.