• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I really tried to watch Velma, and the only way I felt I could watch it was to totally disassociate it from Scooby Doo.

    The problem in doing so, which is obvious in hindsight, is that on its own merits, there isn’t really a show there that can stand on its own two feet and be compelling. That realisation alone should have been enough for the networks to pass, but with star power assigned to the writing and a known IP, I guess this was enough to get the green light.

    I’m all for creative retelling of stories, but the fundamentals don’t change. The absolute WORST thing you can do, once the reviews come in, is to criticise the critical response. Sure, many probably didn’t get the artistic vision, but ultimately you are in the entertainment industry, and the creator and producers arguably gave themselves a heavy job in creating a show that caters across several cultural subjects, while also limiting themselves to the Scooby Doo/Mystery Inc gang. It’s why I don’t consider it “lazy” - if anything, they shot for the stars and hit the ceiling.

    IMO, it’s a bad show, but could have been good if they had written original characters. It would have highlighted that some characters were either unlikeable/lazy, or that the premise needed more work.