• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Catastrophes are now less and less likely, with many lessons learned from Chernobyl and Fukushima

    I swear I do not mean this as a disrespect on you, as your comment was well written/said, but I’ve been hearing that kind of phrasing from companies that run power plants that catastrophically fail for many decades now. I’m definitely in a once-bitten twice shy mode at this point.

    I’ll leave it at this, I hope you’re right, but I can believe you, or my lying eyes (to quote a comedically philosophical man).

    I live in a city powered by a reactor of the same model there was in Chernobyl, but modified following the incident.

    I live nearby a nuclear plant (not Chernobyl design) as well, though now all three of its reactors has been decommissioned because of age.

    I fully trust it.

    You’re not trusting that Chernobyl style design (that’s flawed) you’re trusting it’s operators do not f up and trigger the flaw like they did last time with Chernobyl, and humans are never 100% perfect 24/7. Also, Mother Nature tends to have some input as well.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      By “lessons learned” I don’t mean just operators acting differently. The very reactors are built another way, as to physically not allow what happened on either station. It’s not that my city is powered by unaltered Chernobyl reactor - it was modified as to not allow the graphite rods to be dropped so late, and made automatic on a mechanical level.

      Fukushima-style disaster is simply not possible in my area, but then again, for reactors that are endangered, measures were taken.