![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
“Leader” is only a title. Money rules and they told him “no more, now GTFO.” He was forced out. With no support he really had no choice.
“Leader” is only a title. Money rules and they told him “no more, now GTFO.” He was forced out. With no support he really had no choice.
It’s paraphilia. Specifically, paraphilic infantilism.
There is a documentary on it. I can’t even describe how creepy it is.
Generally IVF involves fertilizing many eggs and then picking the best performing. Technically this is abortion.
I just did a cleanup on someone’s computer that got this. They actually called the number and got scammed out of their whole life savings. The usual Indian scammers.
Multi-account containers?
Can someone explain the “jawline” part? It looks the same to me.
I use WebDAV because my phones use that for all services which keeps everything on my own servers. Contacts, calendar, files, etc. Both Android and iPhone can be set up this way.
How long have you been trading?
The gun wasn’t his. He stole it from his dad. In a country with more guns than people it’s simply impossible to disarm the bad guys.
Instead maybe we should tackle things like mental illness, lack of critical thinking skills, cognitive dissonance, and the destruction of family values. Also people should have to go through training and be licensed to be allowed on the internet.
Boot/root floppies early '92
Sometimes women want a real man with real skills, not a 25-year-old boy living with his parents. Young healthy women are attractive. Win-win.
It’s the way everything is moving. Hardware protected keys can be very useful but it’s a double edged sword. It’s more secure but also allows companies to lock consumers out.
We need rules that say when this tech is used the consumer still gets full control over it. Like what Google does with their Pixel phones and the Titan chip. Not what Apple does.
It’s not incomplete. It’s exactly what happened in this situation. You can’t campaign without money.
If you’re going to refute my “simplistic” explanation you’re going to need more than a simplistic answer that proves nothing. Why am I wrong?