• PooCrafter93@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    11 months ago

    Dude isn’t this “mildly infuriating”. The daily mail is designed to piss people off, feels more than “mildly” infuriating lol

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    11 months ago

    Guys! I have this genius idea.

    Let’s pay them to stop the strike!

    It’s so simple. Give them a reason to keep doing their jobs, and this whole thing can be over with. Amazing.

    • LazyBane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      11 months ago

      Our government can’t pay doctors, but it can give away trillions to private corporations and constantly raise the pay of politicians.

      • TwoGems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Almost like shitstains like Tories shouldn’t ever be elected. It’s amazing how dumb a certain percentage of the population is.

    • luffyuk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m interested, but how do we get our mates from Eton to profit from this?

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    11 months ago

    Amazing how we’ve gone from “clap for the NHS they’re amazing” to “you want fair compensation? psst!”

    Also if the strike has only been going on for a little while then how does the Daily Mail account for the fact that NHS quality has gone down every year of the decade long Tory rule.

    Maybe it’s not the doctors that’s the problem… maybe it’s the politicians (including Labour since Wes Streeting is chomping at the bit to carve up the NHS and continue the Tory legacy)

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I disagree.
        Left is more than wealth. Left is often reffered to socialism or liberalism. Either cases have at its core nothing to do with wealthy at all. Its not because your local politics have the left as wealthy fuckwads that this is everywhere.

        That said, dont get me wrong, this is some terrible shit to say and the wealthy should piss off.

        • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          A) Liberalism is not left wing

          B) Socialism, at its core, is about seizing control of the means of production, as it is they which create wealth.

        • alexius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You can disagree with me all you want. You’re extremely misinformed, though. An entire life of propaganda made you believe some weird shit, but socialism is unequivocally about wealth distribution and liberalism is undoubtedly right-wing.

          I didn’t understand your comment about local politics. Mostly because you can’t possibly know where i’m from, and calling the left ‘wealthy fuckwads’ is just bizarre.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 months ago

    Daily Mail is considered expensive toilet paper by a lot of Brits.

    The worst thing about it is that it’s not even available in two-ply.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    Obligatory

    Fuck the Daily Mail.

    And The Sun along with them.

    Absolute fucking tags that I wouldn’t wipe my ass with.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    How is “despite waiting lists being a record high” on the doctors? That’s on the hospitals or government for not hiring enough doctors, probably because they don’t pay well enough. The doctors should add “the waiting lists are too long” to their complaints (if not already on there).

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      [they] should add “the waiting lists are too long.

      They have, for your information :)

      He said: "The government was presiding over this problem long before any industrial action - waiting lists were steadily getting worse for the decade leading up to the pandemic arriving.

      “In fact, it is these waiting lists - and doctors being unable to do their jobs because of underinvestment, workforce shortages and rota gaps - that lie behind the strikes they’re being forced to take now.”

      reference

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    But didn’t you hear? Nobody wants to work!!!(for slave wages and predatory insurance plans)

    • Badgernomics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      From the paper that brought you: “Hurrah for the Blackshirts” an editorial from 1934 reporting on Hitlers blackshirts, by the then editor Viscount Rothermere who’s son the current Viscount Rothermere still owns it… same shite different arsehole…

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Why is written ‘harming’ in single quotes? Is this some opinion that someone has had that they are publishing as fact?

    The government is just holding out in the hope that public opinion on the strikes turns on their favour or that the nurses and doctors run out of savings to keep striking.

    • lanigerous@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’ll be paraphrased from something a Tory said and I suspect the quotes cover the “paper” from libel since they can then claim it was opinion rather than fact

    • Djehngo@lemmyrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I read a while back that it’s to insulate the paper from any potential defamation lawsuits, the quotes are there to ensure the difference between “we believe the strikes are harming patients also this person says they must stop” and “this person believes the strikes are harming patients and also says they must stop”

      It’s actually very common practice in the UK, most headlines make use of quotations to endorse a position by means of quoting an opinion and providing context to that opinion.

      In this specific case it is of course bullshit, the language of the headline is deliberately worded to incite anger against the healthcare professionals and the quotes are added to preserve the emotive qualities of the headline when read by the layperson while insulating the paper from legal risk.

  • Cabrio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Capitalism is pay to play bitch. Funny how it’s harmful when it affects their control but underfunding healthcare isn’t.

  • SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    And in a few years they’ll headline “Lazy students refuse to study medicine, hospitals closing due to doctor shortage!”

    Then they’ll tell you how the rich go to the EU for treatment and blame it all in Brussels

  • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Patients are harming striking doctors. If they want to be seen sooner, they could help apply pressure to the government to improve conditions, instead of licking boots and crying about labour action.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a very high level of support for NHS strikes, around 2:1 for vs against. Mebbe cast aspersions on those with the power to resolve them, not the people the Daily Mail will never give a platform to.

      • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is that 2 thirds getting off the couch and doing anything? Interesting that the western world can sanction countries under the logic that people can pressure the governments. But when it’s time for pressuring their own, well… suddenly it’s time to get indignant about casting aspersions. At least the French riot. Maybe the UK is waiting for another bus to tell them what to believe.

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re calling yourself comrade but you think it’s all about individual actions and nothing to do with power?

          Fuck knows what sanctions have to do with it. Since when did ordinary people get to decide when and where sanctions are applied?

          Empty posturing, finger-wagging, sneering. Great tools for building solidarity ‘comrade’.

            • JoBo@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you cannot be arsed to think about how power works, there is no helping you.

              Still, at least France will get its revolution. All those people out on the streets, it’s inevitable, right? So easy, the whole world would be a socialist paradise if only people weren’t so stupid and lazy and too busy keeping a roof over their heads to be more like your saintly self.

              • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                your saintly self.

                You hopped up on the high horse first my friend.

                I was originally making a contrary joke in response to the headline. With a bit of a message tacked on about supporting strikers, semi in response to entitled behavior I’ve directly seen by people on the Canadian side of things. With a bit of natural disdain for the British thrown in of course.

                Now it’s true I’ve been a bit of a dick but you’re in the mud with me too lmao.

                there is no helping you.

                And what was it you said?

                Great tools for building solidarity

                Anyway I’m not sure we’re really on separate sides here, so much as just being nasty at this point. So peace.