• jadero@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well, of course they are.

    The region now called Canada was colonized strictly for resource extraction, most exemplified by the Hudson’s Bay Company and the Northwest Company, both still in operation. (HBC, NWC)

    That heritage leads to, among other things, a normalization of foreign ownership of resource extraction companies and a preference for exporting raw materials instead of building out our own manufacturing sector. It also makes it almost impossible to have a reasonable discussion that might lead to effective controls on any extractive industry.

    • Maëlys@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      in Canada they are still allowed to drive those 2004 Peterbilt trucks that run with no emissions controls (no dpf, no euro 7 emission standands: just plain, NOx rich, diesel exhaust gases straight to the atmosphere). If anything, it would help to boycott canadian products.

  • Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unlike the US, Canadian logging companies pay a stumpage fee which goes into planting new trees so there’s no clear cutting. Even the article says the forests aren’t being completed reduced so the concern seems unwarranted.

    Not saying they can’t do a better job but the article reads like a hit piece.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That would make sense if you were talking about a stable existing system of managed timberlands. When you convert virgin forest to managed timberlands, you are on net dumping a whole lot of CO2 into the atmosphere. And Canada is still doing that at scale.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is a tough nut to crack. I am pretty sure Canada uses revenue from logging and mining to help pay for healthcare. This makes it difficult to curb logging and mining.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        $12 billion/yr is not tiny.

        I lived in BC for many years, many Canadians put up with the “bad haircut” and things like Highland Valley Copper because they help fund healthcare and other services. I’m not saying this is good, it’s just how it is. You don’t need to convince me, I think BC should stop logging full-stop and am amazed they still log old-growth.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are specific communities where it’s a big deal, but it’s 3% of Canadian federal revenue. That’s replaceable

    • jadero@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I wish! Resource extraction profits, in general, are rising faster than the rate of inflation, yet health care is being gutted across the board.