Context: I made a poll on PieFed about the new post flairs (so if you are one of the few hundred people who have a PieFed account, follow that link and answer there). Unfortunately Lemmy has neither polls nor post flairs, so this post is to open up the discussion to the wider Fediverse, or rather the subset of it that encompasses Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed, which is called… what exactly?

Is Threadiverse too traumatic & tainted by association with Meta’s (all but entirely defunct) Threads? Is The Verse too cool/poetic/nerdy (but niche) to be understood? I highly advise against Lemmyverse bc mainstream normal people are far less tolerant of tankies than we who are here are willing to put up with. Simply listing the software available sometimes is the best option - like the Interstellar app supports all of Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed, but most support at best 1 or 2 of those - but usually is too long to say and does not roll off the tongue, plus will just keep growing as time goes on. Is Forumverse thus the least bad of the available options, or perhaps you have a better idea? 💡

Anyway, the start to a listing:

  1. Threadiverse
  2. Forumverse
  3. (The) Verse
  4. Lemmy + Mbin + PieFed
  5. Something else?

img

- source for image

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    Forumverse makes the most sense but it really doesn’t roll of the tounge.

    Hence I prefer Lemmyverse or Threadiverse.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Threadiverse kinda captures it, but it also calls association with Threads (by Meta), like if it’s the parent of it, while in fact it’s not even part of it.

  • youronlyone@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    When the first Reddit migration happened, the migrants called it #Threadiverse and has always been that way. Although some tried to change it (Threads was not around yet, or public, IIRC), it didn’t work, the migrants prefer Threadiverse so it stuck.

    Changing names in the Fediverse is not easy since it has grown humongous already. Back in 2008 it was simply called #Identiverse. Then a few years later it morphed into the #Fediverse (this was before ActivityPub, yes, the Fediverse is years older than ActivityPub).

    Back in 2021/2022, we tried to change the name “Fediverse” because Twitter migrants and the Press/Media were whining too much about it. Even though we reached a consensus, the we were far too small compared to the number of new people.

    The people who kept on complaining about the name “Fediverse”, when they were asked to participate in the disucssion and polls, they did not. When they were presented with the new name, they either ignored us or started whining again. 🤷🏽

    Anyway, if there’s a huge population involved, it’s not going to be easy.

    Now, I’m not discouraging you, rather, I shared our experience in the hopes that you’ll find a better way. Because personally, I’m not so fond of “Threadiverse”, haha.

    If you use, for example, the lemmyBB interface, it’s no longer “threadi”, it’s a forum. 😝 (I know, lame reason.)

    Oh! One thing that came out of trying to rename the Fediverse, people don’t want “-verse” anywhere because it’s overused. Multiverse. Metaverse. Fediverse. Threadiverse. Benverse. Omniverse. Panverse. Whoverse. Trekverse.

    • youronlyone@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hmm… I like the -ville suggestion. #Threadiville perhaps?

      • The #Fediverse is the “universe”.
        • The -ville is the “local group”.
          • The various software are the “galaxies”.
            • The instances are the “planets”.

      So:

      • Fediverse
        • Threadiville local group
          • Mbin galaxy
            • Fedia IO planet
          • Kbin galaxy
            • Kbin social planet
          • Nodebb galaxy
          • Lemmy galaxy
            • Lemmy World planet
        • Microville local group
          • Mastoforks galaxy
          • Pleroma galaxy
        • Writingville local group
          • Plume galaxy
          • WriteFreeny galaxy
          • Ghost galaxy
        • Faceville local group
          • Friendica galaxy
          • -key forks galaxy
        • CMSville local group
          • Hubzilla galaxy
          • Drupal galaxy
          • Wordpress galaxy

      😁

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Lemmy Federate also says this:

        1: Threadiverse refers to Fediverse software that implements “FEP-1b12: group federation”. For example, Lemmy, Mbin, Guppe, NodeBB and others…

        Maybe try to get a piefed namedrop there?

        • OpenStars@discuss.onlineOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I noticed PieFed.social on page 9, and the link is functional, even though next to it the status says “disabled”.

          That site doesn’t seem very trustworthy. I wonder if it is measuring how “Lemmy-like” an instance is? Anyway I’ve never heard of that site before, but passing the note to @[email protected] anyway in case it helps:-).

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            It’s run by an instance admin. I wanna say lemy.lol?

            even though next to it the status says “disabled”.

            I believe that just means piefed.social isn’t participating in the service.

            Edit: is that right, @[email protected]?

            • iso@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Yes, it is just disabled. Lemmy Federate supports every threadiverse software and Piefed is one of them.

              Currently Piefed communities can be followed by Lemmy instances but not the other way around.

              In general, every fediverse software that support FEP-1b12 and can receive Lemmy-like PM’s can register to Lemmy Federate.

              /cc @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

              • can@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                53 minutes ago

                Currently Piefed communities can be followed by Lemmy instances but not the other way around.

                You mean using your tool, or overall?

                • iso@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  36 minutes ago

                  IIRC Lemmy and Mastodon PMs are different and incompatible. If you can receive PMs from Lemmy users then you should be able to receive auth codes. Currently @[email protected] is adding both Lemmy and Mastodon PMs here: https://github.com/ismailkarsli/lemmy-federate/pull/33

                  Also software other than Lemmy and Mbin needs to add ‘roleName: Administrator’ to their user webfinger requests. This is because ActivityPub doesn’t have a standard way to expose user roles.

                  I’m thinking of adding another ways of verifying like DNS based verification but still not sure. Any recommendations are welcome :)

  • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Personally I dislike anything with -verse involved because big companies have run it into the ground and then some.

    The boring, dry ways of describing them work best in my opinion.

    Federated forums is the driest, most technical and to the point but not very telling.

    Swap out forum for link aggregator and you have similar, arguably even more technical (certainly more of a mouthful).

    Connected/linked forums might be more approachable, more readily conveying how these are separate forums but networked together.

    Cross-forums may work as well to the same end, but not sure how immediately understandable cross may be in this context and outside of gaming spaces.

    Whatever the case I kind of think this has things backwards. What’s more important than describing and talking about the backend tech is pointing people to any of the sites built with them that have anything of interest to them to bother with. I can’t think of anything online I’ve ever gone to or used because someone told me it was using Apache, Nginx, phpBB, or like an Open Source Web Server or using such and such CDN.

    The reason why is simple: next to nobody talks like that. The only people that might are deep in web dev.

    • OpenStars@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      On the other hand, the software used has an ENORMOUS effect upon the quality and such of the communication. e.g. forum software such as Lemmy allow much longer-form, topic-based discussions than e.g. Mastodon where you have to follow a particular user account or else you won’t see anything at all. So “Mastodon” implies extreme difficulty in having conversations in the first place, especially for non-technical, normie users, and also a heavily short-form tweets/X-cretes/skeets/whatever, user-centric form of communication. Whereas Lemmy allows me to ramble on for quite awhile, and even if you don’t follow my account, by being interested in this topic, you’ll see my words.

      So software isn’t everything, but it also is not nothing either.

      Anyway, we could call ourselves anything we like. Brain-dead fart pirates, I don’t care, so long as we pick a name:-). It might help to pick one that people like though, especially the people that contribute much to making this place what it is.

      I personally don’t mind -verse. I don’t watch most Marvel movies to begin with, and the word itself carries connotations of “the universe”, which is what we want I think bc we are talking about like “the set of all, i.e. the universe of, connected (using ActivityPub protocol) forum-like software platforms”. Hence Fediverse at the high end, i.e. including such platforms as Mastodon and Friendica and Pixelfed, but at the lower end… what there? Threads? ActivityPub Forums? Any short, catchy moniker may work -> so what is it then?

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been using threadiverse, but I prefer forumverse

    It’s immediately clear what it’s referring to, and it leaves it open to other compatible platforms once they implement activity pub nicely. Being able to subscribe and post to official support forums from the forumverse would be a cool promo point

    Also people refer to many things as “threads”. Conversations, comment sections, discord has threads. Forum is much more clear

    • OpenStars@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used to prefer “Forumverse” as well. But people don’t seem to want to use it?

      While “Threadiverse” seems to predate Meta’s Threads here on Lemmy, see e.g. https://szmer.info/post/349217 and this comment from Ada https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/93840 from 2+ years ago. Tbf I did find a reference to Forumverse from 2 years ago as well, but then virtually nobody uses it again until essentially [email protected] rediscovers it a handful of months ago.

      So “Threadiverse” has some history behind it, except then Meta ruined the association for many people. But… we here on Lemmy were using it first!!?

  • _NetNomad@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    i think threadiverse is the move. partly because it’s already in regular use and partky because it’s very self-explanatory. forumverse could have some legs to it now that more traditional forum software like nodebb and soon flarum support federation now, maybe it could refer to the broader category containing traditional forums and the threadiverse, but i feel like leaving out the “fedi” part kinda defeats the point (threadiverse at least partially maintains it by being a pun on it). maybe fediforums is the way to go?

    it’s a whole 'nother can of worms but ironically in my experience the “verse” part of threadiverse is more offputting than the “thread” part because people think “metaverse,” but that’s just anecdotal and the term fediverse itself already has too much momentum to easily fall out of fashion

    • OpenStars@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah and I did not clarify well here that nobody will stop using Fediverse (I think?!): that is a fine term that should continue to exist. But we also need a term for the subset of that which the likes of Lemmy, Mbin, PieFed, and now as you say nodebb and soon flarum (and perhaps eventually Sublinks?) and ofc many others will also join. What is this subset of the Fediverse to be called?

      Ngl, I kinda just instantly fell in love with fediforums as you mentioned it right here. However, it also seems fairly similar to Fediverse, perhaps too much so?

      Forumverse seems more distinct, from the Fediverse? As too does Threadiverse. And the latter has history and traction, but also seems a bit tainted by association with Meta, who seems to destroy everything that it touches? :-P Though importantly, we here on Lemmy were using it first! So is that enough justification to reclaim the term, in people’s minds? What do you in particular think?

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been calling it threadiverse because that is what I saw most other people call it.

    Really all it is is “ActivityPub groups” or if that is too technical, “fediverse groups”.

  • celeste@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Forumverse, I guess.

    (Though I’m always in favor of silly word combos, there aren’t many good ones. I like Piebin, but how do you get lemmy in there? Plebin? No thanks.)

      • OpenStars@discuss.onlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, what features? Polls? Community flairs? The ability to restrict downvotes to only members of a community? The ability to combine multiple communities into one overarching category? And then customize that without needing admin support, and then also share that with other users? The ability to personally block every user from an instance, again without requiring admin approval? The ability to automatically label every user that has a brand new account, less than two weeks old? Or that posts 10x more often than they comment, hence might be an unregistered bot account? Or that gives and receives 10x more downvotes than upvotes, so is at best a controversial and at worst a highly toxic personality - but again, independent of an admin or moderator, and instead being totally in control of the user? Or the ability to block posts based on keywords, but perhaps not all such posts, and instead having granularity of All vs. None vs. Some? Or offering hashtags for content discoverability beyond communities and categories of communities? Or the ability to follow anything you want - a community, a user, a post, a comment (even not made by you) - and arguably far more importantly, the ability to NOT receive notifications for something that you wrote?

        PieFed has all of that, and more. Lemmy has none of it. Do as you please, but now you know. Check it out: https://piefed.social/ .

        Edit: even Reddit lacks many of these features. As it enshittified, it kept adding features that attempted to boost its profitability, like various forms of irl coinage, rather than provide stuff that people actually wanted to see.