• vd1n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how I feel about that. They both deserve to be treated like cartel criminals. NOTHING LESS.

    You gotta realize criminals and street life is the same as the mainstream. Please trust me.

  • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So here’s what we do: we let Threads kill Twitter. Then, when Twitter is dead, we kill Threads.

  • inactive@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This sentiment is so fucking wrong. Please, for god’s sake, please understand that Zuckerberg is NOT the lesser of two evils here. Meta facilitated a genocide by artificially promoting hateful content to boost engagement, quietly and without obvious consent performed behavior experiments on its users, and so much fucking more that the two aforementioned points barely even scratch the surface.

    You people are trading being punched in the face with being beaten senselessly with a baseball bat.

  • Logical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s definitely not worth it. Zuckerberg is the bigger fish here, at least within the social media domain. Meta’s threads replacing Twitter would make them even more powerful than they already are. I don’t like Elon, and it’s crazy that he somehow managed to make Twitter even worse than it was, but we really don’t need Meta to grow even larger.

    • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, if we were still talking about the cage match of be fine watching that weird meat puppet beat musk up, but for social media I think we loose either way.

  • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the correct answer is “fuck both of them”. You don’t need Twitter, you definitely don’t need Threads.

    You don’t even need Mastodon for that matter. You don’t need a constant drip feed of dopamine. If you need to stay informed, you can just use news sites or something.

      • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        hmm, that’s a fair point. I have heard things about independent journalists making use of platforms like Twitter and Tiktok. I wonder if independent journalists have begun to adopt Mastodon as well, or just decentralized social networks in general, to share their news.

        • nutomic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can’t make real journalism in a few hundred characters or in a 10 sec video. But there are lots of bloggers with their own websites.

          • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Meh, they just end up making it a series of posts / videos. If someone’s risking their life by doing shit like going into an active warzone and using social media to keep the public informed of what’s going on, doesn’t that probably count as “real” journalism, regardless of what online platform they upload to?

  • supersane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I genuinely don’t understand the elon hate. Meta is essentially US govt social media, why in the fxck would anyone use their garbage?