Self-driving cars have flooded San Francisco’s streets, and not everyone is happy. Street activists have been using a low-tech solution to incapacitate the vehicles.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure what they’re trying to show though.

      You also can render a human driven car immobile but standing in front of it and have a buddy come up from behind. And what does that prove other than you’re asshole? I don’t see how this activism is different.

      • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please check the date on the article.

        Last I checked, “August 26, 2023” was not two months ago.

        If you’d like to accuse NPR of being slow, go for it.

  • sab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I couldn’t help but note the lack of figures of how unsafe driverless cars are, versus a regular car, per distance driven. And for that matter - how much that number had changed over recent years - because that’s the entire point of these tests, to make traffic safer.

    And when scooter companies flooded the sidewalks with electric scooters, people threw them into San Francisco Bay.

    Ah, that happened here as well. But we just call it vandalism.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    An anonymous activist group called Safe Street Rebel is responsible for this so-called coning incident and dozens of others over the past few months.

    The group’s goal is to incapacitate the driverless cars roaming San Francisco’s streets as a protest against the city being used as a testing ground for this emerging technology.

    She points out that when tech companies test their products in the city, residents don’t have much say in those decisions: “There’s been various iterations of this where it’s like, ‘Oh, yep, let’s try that out in San Francisco again,’ with very little input from anyone who lives here.”

    Safe Street Rebel has cataloged hundreds of near misses and blunders with Cruise and Waymo vehicles over the past few months — even without traffic cones.

    Those incidents include driving through yellow emergency tape, blocking firehouse driveways, running over fire hoses and refusing to move for first responders.

    “The traffic cone protest is an example of how things in the real world can really confound machines, even ones as sophisticated and finely tuned as this,” says Margaret O’Mara, a history professor at the University of Washington who studies the tech industry.


    The original article contains 1,091 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t this turn out to actually be a member of SF city government and his political staff?

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We have very different ideas of “old news,” and feel free to block me if you don’t like what I post instead of complaining on two different posts.

      • Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        This has been posted so many times, I see it at least once per week. Maybe you’re just new

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Check the date on the article.

          And “new.” Oh, that’s funny. Please, check my posting history to see how “just new” I am here.

          • angrystego@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The date on the article means nothing, because the information had been published before in other news sources. This article just republished old news with a new date.
            I feel with you though, you didn’t know that.