If your character’s starting off at level one, they’re really only getting started with adventuring. You can let that be reflected in their backstory.

If you want to play a badass, starting above level 1 is allowed, though probably not recommended for new players still learning the rules of whatever system you’re playing.

  • Flushmaster@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering that a real world new recruit who’s only martial experience is about 8-10 weeks of basic training would probably be a second or maybe even third level fighter, first level characters aren’t very impressive. If there’s an actual zero next to “Experience” on your character sheet you aren’t a grizzled veteran and you haven’t seen anything rougher than a barfight. You probably lost that fight, too.

  • Zoutpeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d never recommend playing dnd 5e at level 1, even for beginners. Level 3 is where classes get their basic identity and you don’t instantly die to everything

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The first few levels should be thought of as a tutorial, where there is no true peril no matter what enemies you face.

      It’s useful to get a feel for a new character before you start piling on all the details of class skills.

      • Zoutpeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But the peril is highest in those first few levels as a strong breeze will kill a level 1 character. I also think it is hard to get a feel for a character if they lack eveything that defines them class-wise imo